DOW™-KNIGHT CI-SYSTEM – Sustainability & LEED


hands in soilDow Building Solutions & Knight Wall Systems are active supporters of the “green building” efforts. Among its many affiliations and alignments with organizations dedicated to sustainable design and construction, Dow & Knight are members of the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), a nonprofit coalition that promotes high-performance green building design.

DOW™-KNIGHT CI-SYSTEM and LEED

More than an insulated wall, the DOW™-KNIGHT CI-System eliminates the need for batt insulation and is a systematic approach to achieving efficiency at every level: simplified design, streamlined construction and reduced energy consumption. The four-in-one system includes rain screen, insulation, flashing and an air barrier. The DOW™-KNIGHT CI-System enables use of thick rigid insulation up to 3.0”* (depending on the exterior veneer) while adaptable to all facades or cladding systems.

In conjunction with other items found in a steel stud wall design, the DOW™-KNIGHT CI-System can contribute to multiple LEED points. For details, download the DOW™-KNIGHT CI-SYSTEM & LEED document.

HOW CAN A WALL CONTRIBUTE TO ENERGY SAVINGS AND CO2 REDUCTION? 

To demonstrate the potential energy savings and subsequent reduction in CO2 that can be achieved with the DOW-KNIGHT CI-System, Dow performed energy calculations on three square building models (footprints of 30,000 ft2, 100,000 ft2 and 200,000 ft2) in seven U.S. cities. Results are presented in Tables 1 and 2.

For example, based on the model in Tables 1 and 2, a 200,000 ft2 building (wall area of 75,132 ft2) built with the DOW-KNIGHT CI-System in Chicago (U value of 0.036) can reduce CO2 emissions by 227,540 lbs compared to a building with a typical wall assembly (R-19 fiberglass batt with 5/8" gypsum board [U value of 0.132]). That’s a potential annual CO2 reduction of 73 percent for the DOW-KNIGHT CI-System compared to a traditional fiberglass insulated wall.

TABLE 1: DOW™-KNIGHT CI-SYSTEM – ANNUAL TOTAL ENERGY SAVINGS POTENTIAL(1,2)
LOCATION3 200,000 FT2 FOOTPRINT BUILDING 100,000 FT2 FOOTPRINT BUILDING 30,000 FT2 FOOTPRINT BUILDING
Wall Area (ft2) 75,132 Wall Area (ft2) 53,127 Wall Area (ft2) 29,098
Annual total kilowatt-hour (kw/h) equivalent savings Miami 46,457 32,851 17,992
Denver 287,963 203,622 111,524
Chicago 380,363 268,959 147,310
San Francisco 89,912 63,578 34,822
Dallas 97,775 69,138 37,867
Seattle 220,507 155,923 85,400
Boston 331,929 234,711 128,552

 

TABLE 2: CO2 EMISSION REDUCTION IN POUNDS BASED ON ABOVE ENERGY SAVINGS
LOCATION 200,000 FT2 FOOTPRINT BUILDING 100,000 FT2 FOOTPRINT BUILDING 30,000 FT2 FOOTPRINT BUILDING
Wall Area (ft2) 75,132 Wall Area (ft2) 53,127 Wall Area (ft2) 29,098
CO2 emission reaction, lbs Miami 144,589 102,241 55,997
Denver 211,781 149,753 82,020
Chicago 227,540 160,896 88,123
San Francisco 93,086 65,822 36,051
Dallas 155,334 109,838 60,159
Seattle 154,554 109,l287 59,857
Boston 198,987 140,706 77,065

 

* Exact insulation thickness depends on specific cladding and wall assembly details per NFPA 285 fire approval. 
(1) Compared to typical gypsum-based wall with R-19 fiberglass batt and 5/8" exterior gypsum sheathing. Effective R-value of R-7.1 for R-19 fiberglass in steel stud application (16" o.c., 6" studs); R-value of 0.56 for 5/8" gypsum board; total effective R-value of 7.56 (U=0.132).
(2) Window area not considered. Height of wall (ground to top) is 14' per story, total three stories. In all cases, study assumed natural gas furnace for heating with 90 percent efficiency, electricity for cooling with a SEER of 10. Calculations based on average heating and cooling degree-day data from
 www.ncdc.noaa.gov. The calculation is based on opaque wall area with conductive heat loss only.
(3) U value of 0.079: 1.5" SPF + 5/8" THERMAX™ (ci) Exterior Insulation for Miami, Dallas and San Francisco.
U value of 0.055: 1.5" SPF + 1.5" THERMAX™ (ci) Exterior Insulation for Denver and Seattle.
U value of 0.036: 1.5" SPF + 3" THERMAX™ (ci) Exterior Insulation for Chicago and Boston
.